Proposed chapter 5 of the Operational code petfood processing
Update – 29 August 2017
Chapter 5 (Further processing and manufacturing of petfood) of the Operational code petfood processing is published.
- Petfood processing: Chapter 5 of the operational code [PDF, 634 KB]
- Summary of submissions [PDF, 119 KB]
The Petfood code of practice was written to give guidance on the currently agreed way to meet the regulatory requirements of MPI under the Animal Products Act 1999. However, the code is being rewritten because it's incomplete and out of date with the Animal products specifications for products intended for animal consumption notice 2017.
The new code is called Operational code petfood processing.
MPI sought feedback on the new Chapter 5: Further processing and manufacturing of petfood. This chapter was developed to help petfood manufacturers to comply with the requirements of the Animal Products Act 1999. It was developed mainly for petfood manufacturers operating a risk management programme.
Have your say
MPI invited you to comment on the proposed new chapter 5 of the Operational code petfood processing. MPI was particularly interested in your feedback on these questions:
- Is the level of detail appropriate for the petfood sector?
- Are the technical aspects correct?
- Are the procedures practical and achievable for the petfood sector?
- Are there any areas that need more guidance?
Making a submission
Consultation closed at 5pm on 2 August 2017.
Submissions are public information
Any submission you make becomes public information. Anyone can ask for copies of all submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the information available unless we have a good reason for withholding it. You can find those grounds in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA. Tell us if you think there are grounds to withhold specific information in your submission. Reasons might include, it's commercially sensitive or it's personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold information can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may require the information be released.